|
|
|
|
Pat Kane - Play Ethic: why believe in work, when it doesn't believe in you? |
|
Glasgow-based journalist and musician Pat Kane is a featured speaker in the 2001 Sydney Congress. His book, The Play Ethic: Living Creatively in the New Century, is due for completion by summer 2001. This is an excerpt of his article in The Observer, which is available in its entirety on-line. |
Man plays only when he is in the fullest sense a human being, said the great German Romantic Friedrich Schiller. As man apprehends himself as free and wishes to use his freedom, then his activity is to play", agreed Jean Paul-Sartre. The classic 20th century psychologists - like Jean Piaget, Donald Winnicott and Erik Erikson - all understood play as our most effective way of mastering the complexities of our world, rather than submitting to its routines. And now that we can watch the very synapses of our minds perform, through medical neuro-imaging, the powers of play are even more confirmed. Those who clear space in their lives for activities that are pleasurable, voluntary and imaginative - that is, for play - have better memory, sharper reasoning, and more optimism about their future. As the dean of play studies, the University of Pennsylvania's Brian Sutton-Smith says, "the opposite of play isn't work. It's depression. To play is to act out and be wilful, exultant and committed, as if one is assured of one's prospects". So to call yourself a "player", rather than a "worker", is to immediately widen your conception of who you are, and what you might be capable of doing. It is to dedicate yourself to realizing your full human potential; to take an essentially active, rather than passive stance towards your environment; and to be constantly guided in this by your sense of fulfillment, meaning and satisfaction.
|
|
International Society for the Performing Arts Foundation |
|